Syncretic politics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article does not cite any references or sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2008) |
 |
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (November 2008) |
| This article is part of the Politics series |
| Party politics |
| Political spectrum |
| Left-right politics Left-wing · Right-wing Syncretic |
| Party platform |
| Party system |
| Dominant-party Multi-party Non-partisan Single-party Two-party |
| Lists |
| Ideologies Parties by ideology Parties by country Parties by UN geoscheme |
| Politics portal |
Syncretic politics involves taking political positions that attempt to reconcile seemingly opposed ideological systems, usually by combining some elements associated with the left with some associated with the right. The term is derived from the older idea of syncretic religion.
Contents |
[edit] Syncretic movements
Noted syncretic movements include Fascism and Producerism. Many lesser-known political syncretisms also exist; examples include the People's Mujahedin of Iran, which combines Marxism and Islamism, Common Course, a Danish political party which blended official communism with anti-immigration sentiments, the National Bolshevik Party of Russia, formed from the union of Leninist and Fascist aesthetics, as well as the Minaret of Freedom Institute, a union between Islamism and libertarianism.
The assassinated Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn and his LPF party are often mentioned as being syncretic[citation needed], especially by commentators outside the Netherlands, since the LPF combined acceptance of soft drug use and equal rights for homosexuals, seen as rather radical left-liberal positions in most of the world, with a strong stance against immigration, which is usually a right-wing sentiment. Others have categorized the LPF as 'reactionary liberal' and deny its platform constitutes syncretic politics.
[edit] Relation to centrism
Syncretic political movements and centrism should not be confused. Although both see their mission as eventual reconciliation, centrism attempts to take moderate elements from opposing sides and combine them into a stabilizing, moderate political force to preserve the harmony of an existing order that is under threat from partisanship.
Syncretist organizations, on the other hand, are usually involved in the construction of a new ideology from the most extreme beliefs of antagonistic movements and see themselves as revolutionary and radical threats to the status quo.
However, confusing the distinction, some have attempted to achieve centrist goals (i.e. modest health-care reform) using radical methods such as destroying the American two-party system (see Radical middle).
[edit] See also
[edit] Examples of groups and ideologies that might be described as syncretic
- Modern Whig Party
- Libertarian Socialism
- Conservative Revolutionary movement
- Consistent Life Ethic
- Fascism
- Hardline
- The philosophy of Robert A. Heinlein, which was both militaristic and socially tolerant.
- International Third Position
- Italian fascism
- The philosophy of Christopher Lasch, a synthesis of Freud and paleoconservatism
- Kampfbund Deutscher Sozialisten combines Neo-Nazi and Communist (Stalinist) positions
- Libertarian conservatism
- Pim Fortuyn List
- National Bolshevism
- National anarchism
- National Revival of Poland, combining extreme nationalism and socially conservative positions with some libertarian aims.
- National syndicalism
- Neo-Tribalism
- People's Mujahedin of Iran
- Producerism
- Radical middle
- Straight edge
- Common Course
[edit] References
 |
This article's citation style may be unclear. The references used may be made clearer with a different or consistent style of citation, footnoting, or external linking. |
