Welcome to roadinet.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

User:Malleus Fatuorum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Page based on a design by Phaedriel.

Hello
   

This editor is a Veteran Editor, and is entitled to display this Service Badge.


Adler's Laws of Wikipedia:[1]

  1. Wikipedia values all contributors equally (especially those with special needs such as a complete lack of judgement or writing abilities).
  2. Elitism is against the core principles of Wikipedia, the encyclopedia that anyone can edit; consequently those who abuse their abilities by writing substantially more than their fair share of featured articles must be made to understand that they are suffered, not supported, by the community.
  3. Anyone who uses humour in Wikipedia (and especially in project space) exhibits a severe lack of respect for those of their fellow editors who have no sense for it.
  4. Prolific writing of content that cannot be improved is a dangerous, systemic, problem because it will eventually lead to the death of this project. We are here to build an encyclopedia, not to finish it.
Statement by User:Hans Adler from one of Giano's many Arbitration Committee hearings.



About me
   

I made my first edit to Wikipedia on 6 June 2006, a minor copy edit to the Delian League,[2] but I didn't begin to contribute regularly until February 2007. One of the first articles I contributed significantly to was Sale, Greater Manchester, which achieved GA probably despite my efforts. I learnt a good deal about what was expected of a GA/FA in the process though. At about the same time I expanded the stub on Sale Water Park to what I thought was a pretty cool article. I look back on it now with some nostalgia, and tidying it up is on my list of things to do. I still get just as much pleasure from writing about small subjects like the Manchester Mummy as I do from writing about the more obviously important ones like the Peterloo Massacre.

My personal baptism of fire with the GA/FA review processes came with Stretford, now a featured article. The road to FA was tough, but a fantastic learning experience, in all sorts of ways. When Chat Moss was promoted to FA on New Year's Eve 2007, I felt that maybe I was beginning to understand what was expected of a Wikipedia article. Since then I've helped to get Middlewich, Beeston Castle, Chester Cathedral and Ordsall Hall to GA, and the Pendle witch trials to FA. One of the things I've most enjoyed was being part of the Greater Manchester Project team that took the Peterloo Massacre from start to FA in just three weeks, a fantastic collaborative achievement.

As well as those articles to which I've contributed content, I also try to help with copyediting, particularly during the GA/FA review processes, where an objection to the quality of prose can be the difference between a pass and a fail. I flatter myself that I've been able to help at least Walter de Coventre, one of the 2,000th featured articles,[3] Navenby, Shaw and Crompton, and History of timekeeping devices to FA in that way.

In November 2007 I accepted a nomination for administrator,[4] perhaps the biggest mistake I've made on Wikipedia to date. That process coloured my view of the project, and I found its vindictiveness to be quite shocking. As a result I withdrew from it, and almost the entire project. Against my better judgement I was persuaded to once again undergo the ritual humiliation that RfA has become in May 2008.[5] That is not an experience that I would care to repeat, and I would encourage other editors to think carefully before submitting to their own RfA.

In June 2008 I had a slight username change, from Malleus Fatuarum to Malleus Fatuorum.


GA reviews
   

I believe that the good article process is potentially one of the best initiatives in Wikipedia – a lightweight, although to some controversial, process that generates a significant improvement in article quality. So I decided it was only fair to try and help out by taking on some of the reviews. This is a list of the GA nominations I've reviewed:

The icon represents the outcome of the review, not necessarily the present status of the article.

I also help out at the GA Sweeps project. The list of articles I've checked is available here, along with the results of the reviews.


Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs