User talk:Mr. Vernon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Help
Hello. I tried to create a page for control4. It was deleted so i deleted the marketing stuff from the page and posted it again but now its blocked and i was given a warning. I dont understand why the creation of the control4 page was blocked. It provides models and information to consumers on the products. it is not promoting the sale of them. I tried to make the page have information like this page [[1]] i dont understand what the difference is. I am new here and have read as much as possible but need help. Please tell me what i did wrong and what i can do to fix this and get the control4 listing actvice.. Thank you - Kevin - —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blackwiredesigns (talk • contribs) 03:41, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Archives
[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mob Wars
It's been nominated. Not sure if you knew. Nancy talk 12:15, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Typo redirect How to publish on wikipedia
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on How to publish on wikipedia, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because How to publish on wikipedia is a redirect page resulting from an implausible typo (CSD R3).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting How to publish on wikipedia, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 01:10, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] No prob!
I tell you, I just want to tear my hair out over this sort of thing. I used to write ad copy and I won a few awards for my efforts. I wish to heaven I could make people understand that this site is totally lame as an advertising medium. Oh, well. We persist. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 03:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Kaelyn
An article that you have been involved in editing, Kaelyn, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kaelyn. Thank you. B.Wind (talk) 07:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Chicken Wing
If you have a problem with me, talk about it with me, don't talk about me behind my back.— Dædαlus Contribs 22:05, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Mr. Vernon, I appreciate your concern in this matter. I'd prefer not to discuss it though. I figure not everyone can get along with every editor. My reasoning for not wanting to address the editor in question would probably only make things worse if I explained it. I prefer to just create articles and edit them, and I can't do that if I am being dragged to the WP:ANI or getting blocked. Chicken Wing (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] WP:DICK
I suggest you read through the above link, because what I posted on the ANI was not an attack, it was letting CW know what he was being a jerk. The only reason he won't respond to me isn't because he has some sort of policy, it's because he thinks I'm an idiot. He made that very clear when I decided to disagree with him about his proposal to change the blocking policy. So, instead of taking a side without knowing the full story, not to mention talking about me behind my back, take the time to review all the material.— Dædαlus Contribs 06:06, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- First, get a grip. Maybe he just doesn't want to argue with you, because you have been argumentative from what I've seen of your behavior in the AfD. I don't care about your prior drama with him. Second, you were talking about me behind my back over at Gwen's talk page [2], so don't act all high-and-mighty about it. Take Gwen's advice and chill. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 06:21, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't mention you, I mentioned an edit you made, about me, behind my back. I was not asking her how I should deal with you, I was asking her what I should do, so don't make it into something it isn't.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- Whatever, I'm not getting dragged into your issues with other editors, and apparently paranoia over someone "talking about you behind your back." If you have issues with me, take it up with WP:AN. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 07:12, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
- I didn't mention you, I mentioned an edit you made, about me, behind my back. I was not asking her how I should deal with you, I was asking her what I should do, so don't make it into something it isn't.— Dædαlus Contribs 07:04, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Tagging of NetWaiting et al. for Speedy Deletion
I don't think A7 can be applied for this article. It appears to be a pre-installed application that comes with certain computers. By the way, I was glad to see the userbox saying you don't support Nazism, if I hadn't seen it I would have assumed otherwise.
Just kidding of course. :) XenocideTalk|Contributions 02:09, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Check out the user's contributions: [[3]]. FYI, he's not exactly reliable. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 02:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
- Regardless of his other edits, this article would appear to be legitimate. As it is sourced, though not necessarily reliably, I would have to think that this would not apply for speedy deletion in any case. Adding that this article's subject appears to be notable, I would think that at worst this article should be applied for AfD or merged with the appropriate Dell computer's article, and at best kept independent. XenocideTalk|Contributions 02:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Lag (company)
I think you gave this final warning to Samlaptop85213 (talk · contribs) in error. The CSD tag was removed by StealthPanda (talk · contribs), who was not the creator of the article. Could you strike out that warning? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 07:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
- (Responding to talkback template) Might as well strike it out, I have indef'ed Samlaptop85213 for a pattern of disruption rather than any one violation. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
