Welcome to roadinet.com on July 6 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

User talk:Redtigerxyz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

Home

Talk

New message

DYK n
In the news

Bling

Gallery



Archives
1.2.3.4.5.6.7
Indic script
This page contains Indic text. Without rendering support you may see irregular vowel positioning and a lack of conjuncts. More...

नमस्कार! Redtigerxyz,Wikipedia Embassy from Marathi Wikipedia(आंतरविकि दूतावास) invites you to Marathi Wikipedia!This template shall keep you informed about support and contribution required in various Marathi Wikipedia articles in times to come.


*First Meetup 1st July 2009 10.30 AM at Agharkar Research Institute Off Bhandarkar Road,Pune.



With warm regards to you all,

~~~~

Marathi Wikipedia Welcome team

Portal:Maharashtra WikiProject Maharashtra wikt translations विकिकॉमन्स मेटाविकि मिडीयाविकि ट्रांस्लेट विकि]
विक्शनरी विकिपीडिया:विकिभेट विकिपीडिया:सहकार्य
Peer reviews needing feedback:
Update:

July 2Stacy London4 Minutes (Madonna song)Bill Finger
July 1Vengeance (2009 film)List of Rurouni Kenshin chaptersList of bridges in MontrealSerial ATAVSP Vision Care
June 30No Line on the HorizonNoah's Ark
June 282008–09 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball teamJonestownBarryville–Shohola Bridge
June 27Star Trek
June 26Joel SelwoodPennsylvania–Reading Seashore Lines
June 24James NesbittCrown FountainRoy of the Rovers


Contents

[edit] Manifestation

Note the belief is tht Narayana manifested as Swaminarayan (NOT Nara Narayana). Thanks, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 14:25, 30 June 2009 (UTC) Narayana from the Nara Narayana is very clear isnt it - the link should be to Narayana becoz it was Narayana (or Krishna) from the pair who did tk avatar. A link to Nara Narayana would make it confusing and sound as if both together took avatar. Wht do u think? Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 13:24, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Nara Narayana on its own would b confusing. How abt either - "Narayana from the Nara Narayana pair" or "Krishna as Narayana" (Krishna is Narayana in Nara Narayana and even the bishop heber ref says Krishna). I dint want to move the manifestation - but saw no way out. I suggest we let it pass GA and then put it back for the FA review (with a note saying this was removed in the GA review but is essential to the article). Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 13:33, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • off hand - Ahmedabad and Bhuj by Swaminarayan himself. I can remember 3 more with idols New Jersey (colonia), Karachi and Gandhinagar. London (Stanmore) and Crawley have smaller ones. There are loads with pictorial images and loads within India will hv idols as well. I tht v finalsied "Narayana from the Nara Narayana pair". On a diff note - hwz the new sea link (or shld I say "Rajiv Gandhi Setu"!). Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 14:13, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • haha - I read Sena-BJP is actually goin to court to name it "Veer Savarkar Setu". Id rather bother bout the hottest summer here in 30 yrs rather thn tht nonsense (this country needs an intro to a/c's man!). Seems ok to me. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 14:31, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • As the info belongs to Swaminarayans time - can v keep the imgs of tht time as well - this was the reasoning when I changed the Crawley pic earlier. The Swaminarayan Faith/Sampraday/BAPS articles can hv todays pics - as its more of today there.Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 14:35, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Well rather then going to court for such a petty matter, they shld hv acted as a constructive opposition, and pinned the govt down on a time frame for the Worli-Haji Ali bridge. Then try and win the elections (they prob need to reconcile with Raj Thakeray fr tht!) by the time its ready, highjack tht project n name it aftr Savarkar! :P Bout the image - the Dholera one also shows tht, I was trying to maintain the 1781-1830 timeline in pics as well. Yup - go ahead. Guess ur off to Pandharpur for Ashadi Ekadashi tom - tty on sat. tc, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 22:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Panch Kedar

Hi! Redtiger,

Thanks for the assessment of my article Chittorgarh Fort. I intend to post a four articles single Hook on the above subject. Since you have been a great contributor to Hinduism articles, I wish to know if you have visited all the five Kshetras and if so do you have any photos of Madhyamaheswar,Rudranath and Kalpeswar temples. The other two temples namely,Kedarnath and Tungnath are fairly well covered but there are no details of the other three. I will prepare them with Panch Kedar as the main artcile in my sand box and I would appreciate your contribution of valuable inputs so that we could subesequently conominate them. I will start it after your response. --Nvvchar (talk) 14:51, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

The above article will take some time. In the meanwhile, please have a look at my User:Nvvchar/sandbox and let me know if you wish to co-nominate the article Royal Opera House (Mumbai). Some photos of the Opera house and if you could also add the latest info on its restoration, it would embellish it. I will post it after you confirm. It is an expansion of an exisitng article.--Nvvchar (talk) 00:47, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] GA Sweeps July update

Thanks to everyone's dedicated efforts to the GA Sweeps process, a total of 290 articles were swept in June! Last month was our second most successful month in reviewing articles (after May). We are currently over 70% done with Sweeps, with just under 800 articles left to review. With nearly 50 members, that averages out to about 15 articles per person. If each member reviews an article every other day this month (or several!), we'll be completely finished. This may sound difficult, but if everyone completes their reviews, Sweeps would be completed in less than two years when we first started (with only four members!). With the conclusion of Sweeps, each editor could spend more time writing GAs, reviewing at the backlogged GAN, or focusing on other GARs. Again, I want to thank you for using your time to ensure the quality of the older GAs. Feel free to recruit other editors who have reviewed GANs in the past and might be interested in the process. The more editors, the less the workload, and hopefully the faster this will be completed. If you have any questions about reviews or the process let me know and I'll be happy to get back to you. Again, thank you for taking the time to help with the process, I appreciate your efforts! --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 18:04, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks for your review

Military history reviewers' award
By order of the coordinators, for your help with the WikiProject's Peer and A-Class reviews April to June 2009, I hereby award you this Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award.  Roger Davies talk 12:25, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

Thanks, but (this is a little embarrassing) what did I do to get the "Military history WikiProject Reviewers' award"? Which article earned ne this???? --Redtigerxyz Talk 13:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

This one. We have long memories at Milhist :)  Roger Davies talk 13:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs