Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Maths, science, and technology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
- Talk:Chronic fatigue syndrome A group of editors will delete any reference to bacterial cause of this condition as well as the use of antibiotics to treat it -- despite a large volume of literature report success. Also the eMedicine article cites both. It suggest a distinctive lack of NPOV.
- Talk:Homosexual transsexual This article has had a NPOV dispute tag put on it by an editor who is involved in real life drama related to this topic. Could some uninvolved editors please take a look at this and give me their opinions. Does it sound baised. If so specifically what in it sounds biased. (Please don't just write it's tone or some other intangible emotion you feel upon reading it. Please give me specific things that can be done to make it sound less baised if it in deed sounds biased to you. I have also requested comments from the "Society, sports, law, and sex" notice board because this is a topic in a human social science. Not a hard exact science.
- Talk:Gunderson Do-All Machine Question about notability of a "kinetic sculpture" built from old machinery
- Talk:Ars Technica This is a dispute regarding the usage of big-boards.com as a reliable source.
- Talk:List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts Is it okay for Wikipedia to make a distinction between scientific societies and skeptical societies as different "tiers" of sources?
- Talk:Strengths and weaknesses of evolution The neutrality of this article - particularly the lead - is in question. Lead may not to be an explanation of the topic, but an argument in opposition to the topic.
- Talk:Planetary habitability What should this article be titled?
- Talk:Sunset What definition of "sunset" should the article use, and hence what images should be used to lead the article?
- Talk:Lena Soderberg Should the standard test image "Lenna" be allowed in the "Lena Soderberg" article?
Manually-added entries:
User:Nerdseeksblonde/Marchywka_Effect Need comment on notability as well as issues with autobiographical material that is not strictly an autobiography or at least info concerning descriptions of "living people". This could be my first contribution is appropriate and I appreciate there are a number of potential issues with this topic so comments would be very helpful. Thanks.
To add a discussion to RFC:
- Add {{RFCsci| section=section name !! reason=a short summary of the discussion !! time= ~~~~~ }} to the talk page section where the discussion will be held.
- Mind the exclamation marks! Do not use pipe symbols to separate the parameters.
- Warning:
!and=will not work, as they are used to separate parameters.{{and}}might work outside of the time parameter. The vertical pipe (|) works again. - To add an entry manually, click the "add a discussion" link. On the top of the list, note the name of the page and a short summary of the discussion.
- For more information, see Wikipedia:Requests for comments.
- Report problems to Wikipedia talk:Requests for comments.
